Negative Nancy or Negative Narrator?
Throughout Fyodor Dostoevsky’s book,
Notes from Underground, the narrator
has a hard time interacting with the people that surround him. He is constantly
in a state of isolation. From the beginning of the book, the narrator says that
he is more intelligent than everyone. He says, “I’m to blame, first, because I’m
more intelligent than everyone around me” (Dostoevsky, 9). He also thinks that he has a heightened
consciousness than everyone else. This heightened awareness in some ways
tortures the narrator by allowing him to see things that the people around him
misses. It also prevents him from being able to live a normal life. It changes
the way that he interacts with people and makes it a challenge to make friends
because he tends to isolate himself, has bad social skills, and has a bad
perspective of himself.
The
narrator has not been a fan of interacting with people. He has constantly been
in a state of isolation. The narrator says, “I resigned at once and settled
into my corner. I lived in this corner before as well, but now I have settled
into it” (Dostoevsky, 6). This passage seems to suggest that he has always been
a fan of being in this corner by himself and not having to interact with other
people. Even at work, he does not like to interact with the people around him.
He says, “I did not associate with anyone, even avoided speaking, and shrank
more and more in my corner. At work, in the office, I even tried not to look at
anyone” (Dostoevsky, 42). This is another example where he makes no attempt to
talk to anyone or interact with anyone. The narrator also isolates himself in
his own mind from other people. He says, “One other circumstance tormented me
then: namely, that no on e else was like me, and I was like no one else. ‘I am one,
and they are all,’ thought I and ¾I’d
fall to thinking” (Dostoevsky, 45). He not only isolated himself in the real
world but also fully thought that was unlike anyone else around him. By
thinking that it is him against everyone else, it makes him more reluctant to
try and interact with people. This is one way that the heightened awareness effects
the way that the narrator lives.
The
narrator also has extremely bad social skills. He has no idea how to interact with
people around him. One instance that shows this is his interaction with the
police officer. He wants to get attention from people but this officer just
moves him out of the way like he was not even there and this infuriates the narrator.
He says, “I left the tavern confused and agitated, went straight home, and the
next day continued my little debauch still more timidly, downtroddenly, and
sadly than before, as if with a great tear in my eye ¾ yet I did continue” (Dostoevsky,
49). He was so distraught about this interaction that he starts to follow
around this officer so that he can plan to get the police officer’s attention. He
could not just settle the argument at the time like a normal human would but he
had to draw out a specific plan to run into the man so that he could get his
attention. Whenever he finally runs into the officer, the officer does not even
acknowledge the narrator but he still acts like he finally got his attention. The
narrator says, “I did not yield an inch and passed by on perfectly equal
footing! He did not even look back and pretended not to notice: but he only
pretended, I’m sure of that… The point was that I had achieved my purpose,
preserved my dignity, yielded not a step, and placed myself publicly on an
equal social footing with him” (Dostoevsky, 55). The narrator thinks that he
was finally gotten revenge for the officer putting to the side like he did not
mean anything but he really never got the attention of the officer in the first
place. His heightened consciousness makes him think that people notice things that
they really never do and this makes it very difficult for him to interact with
other people.
Another
way that the heightened consciousness prevents him from living a normal live is
that it makes the narrator think badly of himself. Throughout the book, he
thinks that all of his friends or coworkers think badly of him. He says, “I
noticed very well that my colleagues not only considered me an odd man, but ¾ as I also kept fancying ¾seemed to look at me with
a certain loathing” (Dostoevsky, 43). He always thinks that his acquaintances
think of him in a bad way even though he knows that he is intelligent. He even
tries to think of reasons why these people think badly of him. He says, “Of
course, I understood that they must scorn me now for the unsuccess of my career
in the service and for my having gone too much to seed, walking around badly
dressed and so on” (Dostoevsky, 61). He even makes excuses for these people to
think badly of him. This is another way that his heightened consciousness
effects him.
The
narrator has a completely unique way of living his life. Rather than living
around people, he would rather live in his corner away from others. He also
would rather not interact with people and when he does interact with people
they are not aware that he is trying to interact with them. I think that the reason
that he lives his life like this is because of his heightened consciousness. His
heightened consciousness makes him not understand the way that other people
think and the how they act. This effects the way that he interacts with people
and the way that they interact with him.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteYour essay provides interesting input on the narrator and his intelligence. Your mention of the narrators heightened sense of consciousness is also mentioned in Baylee's essay Head vs Heart ( https://bayleevasquez.blogspot.com/2019/01/head-vs-heart.html). You both agreed that the narrator is intelligent and you both discuss the repercussions he faces from his intelligence. Both of your essays cover how the narrator is the underground man and how he forces himself to be a societal outcast. Both essays cover how the narrator longs for relationships but cannot have good ones because he does not act properly in social settings. Baylee's essay explains that the narrator is a representation of how someone's attitude and personality can affect their decisions. Both essays highlight the reasons the narrator separates himself from others and how he feels. However, Baylee examined why the narrator acts the way he does on a different level and she approaches the character's personality with a methodical process. Baylee's essay points out that it is important to have reason and logic but only in moderation. Baylee views the narrator as an image of someone making irrational decisions because they are trying to be too logical and intelligent.
ReplyDelete